Saltar navegación e ir al contenido principal
Biblioteca digital de Bogotá
Logo BibloRed
Saltar el buscador

Esta ingresando al contenido principal

  • Tesis

Legitimacy of governmental strategies combating terrorist groups in Colombia vs. the illegitimacy of curtailing first-rank rights. A conflict between state’s responsibilities and individuals’ rights

CONTENIDO DE LIBRE ACCESO

Este contenido es de libre acceso. Solo haz clic en el siguiente botón.

Ir a este contenido
  • Autor
  • Año de publicación 2004
  • Idioma Inglés
Descripción
The question addressed in this paper was whether a government, in a regime considered democratic, can legitimately curtail civil rights as a means of protecting public order and the sovereignty of the state. The second part of the question is what should be given priority when there is a tension between fundamental rights and the state’s duty to maintain public order. The case analyzed was the antiterrorism law passed in the Colombian Congress in December 2003.This law was one of the main strategies developed by Alvaro Uribe’s government on its first presidency period to fight terrorism. The purpose was to create a legal strategy to combat terrorism and to guarantee public order and the sovereignty of the state, which were constantly undermined by illegal armed groups.This case study reveals a tension between the government’s duty to maintain public order and individual rights – particularly the right to freedom, the right to privacy, and the right to habeas corpus. The tension in the antiterrorism law appears when the government limits first-rank rights as a means to combat acts of terrorism. In a country that faces an internal armed conflict that weakens democracy, the approval of the antiterrorism law gives too much authority to the government and jeopardizes fundamental rights and freedoms. Throughout the paper, the autor try to prove that the constraints on fundamental rights in such a scenario could result in an undermining of the constitutional regime and in the loss of democratic legitimacy.
Citación recomendada (normas APA)
Renata Amaya González, "Legitimacy of governmental strategies combating terrorist groups in Colombia vs. the illegitimacy of curtailing first-rank rights. A conflict between state’s responsibilities and individuals’ rights", Colombia:-, 2004. Consultado en línea en la Biblioteca Digital de Bogotá (https://www.bibliotecadigitaldebogota.gov.co/resources/2081181/), el día 2024-04-28.

Contenidos relacionados

Compartir este contenido

Al liberal de Caracas num. 53 [recurso electrónico] / [Un liberal de Bogotá]

Copia el enlace o compártelo en redes sociales

Compartir este contenido

Lamentos del pueblo a sus representantes [recurso electrónico] / El pueblo

Copia el enlace o compártelo en redes sociales

¡Disfruta más de la BDB!

Explora contenidos digitales de forma gratuita, crea tus propias colecciones, colabora y comparte con otros.

Afíliate

Selecciona las Colecciones en las que vas a añadir el contenido

Para consultar los contenidos añadidos busca la opción Tus colecciones en el menú principal o en Mi perfil.

Mis colecciones

Cargando colecciones

Compartir este contenido

Legitimacy of governmental strategies combating terrorist groups in Colombia vs. the illegitimacy of curtailing first-rank rights. A conflict between state’s responsibilities and individuals’ rights

Copia el enlace o compártelo en redes sociales

¿Eliminar esta reseña?